About an Aboriginal Representative Body !

About an Aboriginal Representative Body !

Frank Pio Russo – August 05, 2017.

Why would one want an Aboriginal Advisory Body to tell our Parliament what to do ? Are Aborigines such an ultra-intelligent breed or something, that we need their suggestions… far from it : they could not even invent the wheel !

If they were any good and worthy of it, why can’t they get elected like everybody else that’s in Parliament? And anyway that’s already happening: they already have Ken Wyatt and Linda Burney in there! Should we kick these 2 out of Parliament, so that their representative body can go ahead, or should we let the Aborigines have both the cake and eat it too and have two bites at the cherry!

The reality is that it would be mainly the half-casts with a ‘white’ education, that would hog all the positions… so what’s the point… most of these “half”-casts are only ‘part’ Aborigines, hence most of their “roots” are already represented!

Perhaps every racial ethnic group, should have its own representative body: i.e. one that’s Indian, one that’s Chinese, one Greek, one Italian and so on – the Parliamentary process would become a real Tower of Babel!

In view of this, I say no to such a representative body as it would be incredibly divisive: we’re all Australians and we all get the same equal democratic vote and use it as we wish.

Frank Pio Russo.

“18C current legislation: should we ban telling the truth simply because it might offend someone?”

I recently received the message below from a contributor – now if I were an Aborigine I would feel very offended and humiliated by its content!? However is that any reason to hide the TRUTH – if it were a veracious and historical statement – and spread lies instead, in an attempt to mollycoddle anybody who might be about 1% Aborigine and might feel offended that the rest of him (or her)– i.e. 99% – is superior to his measly 1% ?!!

NB: The following does not necessarily represent my personal views on the matter – I’m only mentioning it so that someone can rebut them if they are not veracious enough !

“An Australia Day message !

I am sick to death of seeing all these ‘white’ people claiming to be Aborigines and marching to cause violence and mayhem! I was disgusted to see this white woman with blue eyes, saying “they massacred my people!”

The facts are that when the civilized English came, it was in the “colonial days”, and in those days whoever was the more powerful took over any land he wanted by force ! Perhaps the Aborigines would have rather been brutalized by non-civilized people… e.g. the Indonesians or Japanese – I think it’s a fact that at the time the English were by far the most civilized people around !

And why isn’t it ever full-blooded Aborigines voicing such sentiments ? The “real” Aborigines had not even ever invented the wheel, nor did they ever build any houses… if anything at all ! Their maths apparently consisted of : “one, two, and many” – a truly not very complicated mathematical system at all !!

They were nomadic and went “walkabout” to where ever their whims took them… today people see some very early cave-drawings and don’t realize that there were some pre-diluvium civilizations that were global, and could have been responsible for such things rather than the Aborigines!

Yes such nomads did not own the land, and what’s more did not even exist as an organized proper society: today some of these half-breeds like to set-up a government-tent of some sort or “embassy-tent” in Canberra… but the truth is that they never actually had any government at all during their pre-white existence they were simply “nomadic savages” !!

Thanks to Keating… they’ve come a long way… and yet they show no gratitude at all – only contempt! All I’ve got to say is that no matter how much money the whites spend, the “gap” will never be bridged till their primitive genes are diluted down a great deal more !!

Anonymously contributed.”

Races, breeds, statistics and probability!

Subject: Races, breeds, statistics and probability!

“There’s all this talk about having to be ‘politically correct’… what is it about politicians that makes them so stupid and ignorant.., far worse than any peasant I’ve ever known?
In some languages there’s no difference between “races” and “breeds” i.e. a sub-group within the same species… e.g. one would say “what race of dog is that?”… yet we seem to make a difference between human “breeds” and dog “breeds”… the former are all coequal as if they were all members of some sort of holy trinity, whereas the latter are all different and it is generally accepted that they have different traits!

It’s the some ‘bloody’ thing that all those PC fuckwits don’t want to admit: black people are predisposed to aggression and violence just like pit-bulls are… also some breeds of dogs are predisposed to having a high degree of intelligence e.g. German shepherds, border collies and poodles. Others are supposedly very stupid.,. e.g. the whippet, the greyhound and the Afghan… the same applies to human “breeds”!

Some dogs are renowned for particular traits e.g. tracking scents and smells – such as the blood-hound! Likewise Aborigines make good trackers!
I really don’t know why I bothered to do a university course in probability and statistics when it’s supposedly not PC correct to use such knowledge! Apparently one’s not supposed to acknowledge that most crimes are committed by ‘blacks’ and ‘aborigines’, so as to be able to take sensible precautions!

And ridiculously ‘middle-eastern’ looking people complain of being profiled or singled out at air-ports!! LOL… what’s the point of statistics and probability if one is not willing to learn any lessons! The same goes for blacks complaining of being ‘profiled’ or stereotyped in shops etc.
One thing that really annoys me, is when the media always mentions the ethnicity of a white man that commits a crime, but always refrains when it’s a black or aborigine,,, and then they ridiculously ask for information from the public when they give them nothing to go on! LOL

Yes governments should be able to look at our migrant forces and predict which ethnicities are productive and which tend to gravitate to the unemployment benefits… e.g. it’s pointless to argue that just because we brought in Italians, Greeks and Vietnamese, we should also bring in middle-easterners and blacks… the 2 groups are completely different.
I wish all these fuckwits would wake-up, and stop listening to moronic, leftist, gays and feminists!”
Anonymously contributed.

Islam – a political ideology!

Islam – a political ideology!

Anonymous – September 07, 2016,

A) Is it about radicalization or simply buying into the political aspirations ?

Early Christianity had 2 faces: the literal story-telling for the gullible beginners, and the deep and complicated world for the initiates. In Paul’s writings which far predated the literalist Gospels, he distinguishes between these phases as “fleshly” and “spiritual” Christians, with the former still needing the “milk” or childish Christian fables (like many of the later Gospel stories).

Eventually the literalist arm won out, simply because it was organized well enough to become a temporal ‘power’ with political aspirations, and also because religious “gnosis” was too esoteric for the average person to contemplate.

Likewise I believe that Muslims have two “faces” today as well: the literalist and the political wings. Of course it is easy to see that the literalists are out of their depths in modern secular society, and would soon die out in today’s world. However their smarter members are able to see that with the political wing – and their subjugated women breeding as slavish cattle – they could possibly take over the world – unless the west wakes up to their objectives! Wake-up you sleepy west ! (???)

Anonymously contributed.

 

B)  Islam: a political ideology rather than a religion.

Freedom of religion is guaranteed under some constitutions. However the big question is, is Islam really a religion or is it a political ideology?

To me the fact that most of these terrorists are not really serious about their religion, implies the truth that it is a political ideology. Take the perpetrator of the recent Nice attack… by all accounts he was not very serious about his religion, and even consumed alcohol regularly ! Furthermore, apparently many of the major-event terrorists -e.g. September 11 – usually embark on a hedonistic pursuit before going ahead with their ventures !

True you might say… “So what, many Catholics are not serious about their religion!” However, the telling factor is that none of the non-serious Catholics would be willing to blow themselves up for a religion they’re not very serious about !

Yes there’s no doubt about it, Islam is a political ideology that should be banned out of existence. Its goal is always some violent and cruel politico-religious totalitarian system of government, with archaic laws that are a throwback to Levitical Israelite precepts of some possibly 3,500 years ago! These have no currency and are incompatible with modern society. The whole western world should unite in banning such primitive medieval display of barbarism, and save these inbred imbeciles from being slaves to their own primitive stupidity.

 

C) When is the world going to say “enough is enough” !!

The news is constantly moving from one atrocity to another… the variables may change – in this case it’s a Tunisian-French person – yet the common factor to all of these incidents is the same: a MUSLIM was involved !

 

The imbecilic politicians can try anything they want – they cannot stop it! – Any Muslim can take up ‘the cause’ at any instant – their Koran demands it – and it cannot be predicted who will and who will not! So how do you stop all Muslims from doing any driving of any vehicle at all? It’s impossible it cannot be done!

The only alternative all these moronic politicians have, is to re-patriate all their Muslim citizens including those born in their countries… they obviously don’t want to live in our law systems – let them go where they might be happy !

Anonymously contributed.